Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Seeker's avatar

Bizzare that your takeaway is this. If the nets had tanked properly they wouldn’t be picking this low. Would they have won the lottery? Probably not. Would they have a higher pick? 100 percent.

Expand full comment
Eric Dashman's avatar

What was to learn? History was staring the Nets in their collective faces. In the new era, no worst-loss team has ever won the #1 pick; Detroit dropped to 5 for 2 years in a row; Atlanta came from 10th to 1st last year. Sean and company are not fools, hence the recognition that quantity trumps quality, especially in a supposedly generational draft. Is it 6 picks out of the top 40 or 5 in the top 36? Those who say that the Nets should have tanked worse are delusional. Players and coaches don't tank. Sean got rid of vets on expiring contracts and stocked the team with wannabe's and never-wills. They may have just gotten a few actual players to emerge from this lost season, despite your 'lack of talent' claims.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts